Nobody Cooked At Home In Rome

Most Romans never cooked a meal in their lives. Not once. The city had a million people and almost none of them had a kitchen. Most Romans lived in cramped, wooden-framed apartment buildings where open flame meant the whole block burns down — so cooking was effectively banned. If you wanted a hot meal, you went outside.

And outside, the city had an answer for that. On nearly every block: a thermopolium, a masonry counter with ceramic jars of hot food sunk into it, menus painted on the walls, customers eating standing up in the street. Rome invented fast food two thousand years before the drive-through.

Despite dining out for each meal, there was almost zero variety in flavor because everything they ate — rich and poor alike — was covered in a fermented fish sauce so pungent it had to be made outside the city walls. The Romans called it garum. Seneca called it something less polite. We might call it umami.

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:00

Nobody in Rome cooked dinner, not most people, not the overwhelming majority of the million human beings packed into the greatest city on Earth in the year one hundred AD. They woke up, they went to work, and when they were hungry, they went outside and bought food from one of the hundreds of establishments that lined every street in every neighborhood. And they ate it standing at a counter or sitting on a bench or walking, and then they went home to apartments that contained no kitchen, no hearth, no means of producing heat for food, no cooking equipment of any kind. This is not a metaphor for a busy modern lifestyle. It is a structural fact about how the city of Rome worked. Most Romans literally could not cook at home. The building they lived in was made partly of wood, their room was small and poorly ventilated, and their landlord, or the law or both, had forbidden open flames above the ground floor. If you wanted hot food, you went outside. This was not unusual. This was simply Tuesday. That single fact should begin to unsettle the picture most people carry of ancient Rome. But it is only the beginning. Before this episode is done, the things you assume about what Romans ate, how they got it, what it tasted like, and what food meant to the people who ate it will have been dismantled and replaced with something considerably stranger and more interesting than the picture you started with. The city those Romans woke up in was not a city in any sense that would feel familiar from the outside. Rome in the second century AD was home to somewhere between eight hundred thousand and a million people. Scholars argue about the upper bound, but not the scale. It was the largest city in the Western world by an enormous margin, and it would remain so for well over a thousand years after it fell. To sustain a population that size, the city had to be built vertically. The Insuli, the apartment buildings, rose five, six, seven stories from the street, their upper floors timber framed and increasingly precarious, their lower floors brick and stone and somewhat more stable. The lower apartments with their higher ceilings and sturdier construction were rented by people who could afford them. The upper floors, where the rooms were smaller, and the construction more flammable, were rented by people who couldn't. In a typical upper floor apartment, a family might have two or three rooms. There was no running water above the ground floor. You carried water up from the street level fountain or paid someone to carry it for you. There was no sewer connection. Waste went into pots and was either carried down or, despite laws against the practice, sometimes simply dropped from windows into the street below, which is why Roman law imposed heavy fines on anyone who injured a pedestrian from above, and there was no kitchen, no hearth, no built-in cooking surface of any kind. The fire risk from a cooking brazier in a small wooden framed room on the fifth floor of an apartment block was simply too high. Rome burned with terrifying regularity throughout the Republican Empire. The Great Fire of sixty four AD under Nero destroyed perhaps two thirds of the city. It was not the first and would not be the last. Fire was the governing fear of Roman urban life, and cooking was one of its primary causes. So you went outside. The establishments you went to were called Thermopolia, from the Greek for a place where something hot is sold. They lined the streets of Rome and every major city in the empire, an L-shaped masonry counter at street level, facing the foot traffic, with large terracotta jars called dolia sunk into the counter's surface so their mouths were flush with the top. The dolia held food and drink, kept at temperature by hot water, or the residual warmth of the counter's construction. Behind the counter, a proprietor or slave waited to serve whatever the house had that day. Above the counter, painted frescoes advertised the menu, not in words but in images, because not everyone could read, but everyone could recognize a duck. We know this in extraordinary detail because of something that happened on the morning of August 24, 79 AD, when Mount Vesuvius erupted and buried the city of Pompeii under four to six meters of volcanic ash and pumice in a matter of hours. In December of 2020, archaeologists completed the excavation of a thermopolium in Pompeii's Regio V, the first of its kind to be fully uncovered in its entirety down to the last detail. What they found was a snapshot of a Tuesday morning frozen. The masonry counters still stood. The dolia was still in place. The frescoes were still vivid, two mallard ducks painted upside down, ready for butchering, a rooster, a sea nymph riding a seahorse across one full panel, an image that appears to be a picture of the shop itself, a kind of logo, something that would have been recognizable from down the street. And on the frame surrounding a painting of a dog on a leash, scratched by hand into the plaster, an inscription Nysia Sinada Cacator, which translates without diplomatic softening as Nisius, you shameless shitter. Someone who worked there, bored between customers, annoyed at a colleague, possessing opinions they wanted the wall to know about, had left a thought that survived two thousand years. The food business, it turns out, has always attracted a certain kind of workplace humor. Inside the dolia, the ash had preserved something even more remarkable. The remains of the last food that had been in them duck bones, goat bones, pork, fish, land snails, sometimes all mixed together in the same jar. In one of the wine dolia, researchers found ground fava beans at the bottom, exactly as described in a recipe from the Roman cookbook Opisius, where ground beans or egg whites are added to red wine overnight to clarify and lighten it, producing a pale wine from a dark one by morning. The fresco painter who painted the ducts on the counter, the ducks he painted ended up preserved inside the jars directly beneath his work. The painting was the menu, and the menu was in the jar, and the jar was in the counter, and the counter was in the ash, and the ash was in the hill, and the hill waited nineteen hundred and forty one years for someone to dig it up and read it. Eighty thermopolia have been identified in Pompeii alone. More are expected as excavation continues. In the city of Rome, there would have been hundreds. Walk any direction, from any point in the city, and you would pass one within a few minutes. This was the infrastructure of daily eating for the majority of the population of the greatest city in the world. But before the thermopolium, in many cases, came something else. Something that to a modern eye looks even stranger. The grain dole. On specific days each month, tens of thousands of Roman men walked to distribution points around the city, most famously the Porticus Minucia Frumentaria in the campus Martius district, and collected their monthly ration of wheat. About thirty-three kilograms per person per month free of charge. The system was called the Anona, and it had been running in various forms since the late Republic, when a tribune named Clodius Pulcher first made grain distribution free rather than merely subsidized in fifty eight BC. After that, no emperor could take it away. Every emperor who followed from Augustus to the last Western Emperor in four hundred and seventy six AD maintained the dole because the political cost of ending it was simply too high. It became as permanent a feature of Roman life as the aqueducts. By the second century AD, somewhere between two hundred thousand and two hundred fifty thousand adult male citizens were receiving the dole. That was roughly a third of state revenues being spent on feeding the city. The grain itself was coming from Egypt, from North Africa, from Sicily, vast quantities shipped across the Mediterranean each year, the logistics of which we will return to. The recipients were a specifically defined group called the Asterisk Plebs Frumentaria Asterisk, the grain people. And here's the thing that surprises modern readers most. They were proud of it. Not ashamed, not embarrassed, not quietly grateful in the way a person receiving a government benefit today might feel complicated about the fact. Proud. Men had it carved on their tombs, in a culture where tombstones catalogued a person's accomplishments and identities the way a modern LinkedIn profile might, soldier of the Fourth Legion, husband of such and such, father of three, membership in the plebs fruimentaria appeared as a fact worth recording, an identity worth preserving. To understand why you have to understand what it meant to be a Roman citizen and what Rome meant to the people who lived in it. Rome was not merely a city. It was the center of an empire that at its height encompassed forty five million people across three continents, roughly a third of the entire human population of the planet. It had conquered everything worth conquering from Britain to Egypt, from Spain to Syria, and for several centuries it had made those conquests pay. The wealth of the known world flowed into Rome. Grain from the Nile Valley, olive oil from Iberia, garum from the factories of coastal Spain, silk from the east via overland trade, marble from Anatolia, gold and silver from the mines of conquered territories, grain again and again, always grain, the fundamental caloric basis of civilization loaded into ships and sent to feed the city at the center. Roman citizenship was not abstract, it was material. It meant that you were part of the entity that had done all of this, that had built the roads and the aqueducts and the law courts and the legions that kept the borders where they were. The grain dole was the most direct expression of that citizenship. You received a share of what Rome had taken from the world because you were Rome. The grain coming from Egypt into Ostia was not charity, it was tribute. It was the proceeds of conquest, distributed to the people whose ancestors had made the conquest possible. When a Roman citizen collected his grain, he was not collecting welfare. He was collecting his dividend. The grain itself, of course, he then had to do something with. Most recipients took it to one of the city's commercial bakeries to be ground and baked. Private ovens were rare. Communal baking facilities were everywhere, and the labor of converting wheat berries to bread was specialized enough that it made sense to pay for it rather than attempt it at home. By the fourth century AD, Rome had two hundred and fifty-four commercial bakeries registered with the state, all of them regulated, all of them given specific privileges to ensure their cooperation with the supply system. The Emperor Aurelian, in the third century, went further. He converted the grain dole to baked bread distributed directly from state bakeries, so that the recipient didn't have to mill or bake at all. He simply arrived and collected a daily loaf, and Aurelian added olive oil, and then wine, and then pork. By the late empire, a qualified Roman citizen was collecting, at no cost, the basic components of every meal he would eat, not because the emperor was generous, because no emperor who stopped providing these things had survived the attempt. The grain came from Egypt. Almost everything else of nutritional significance came from somewhere else too, and the scale of what Rome consumed and the logistics required to move it were, until the Industrial Revolution, simply without parallel anywhere in human history. Start with the oil. Rome imported roughly twenty three million kilograms of olive oil every year. The primary source was the province of Bayerica, what is now Andalusia in southern Spain, where olive groves produced oil of consistent quality in quantities large enough to supply an empire. The oil was shipped in terracotta amphorae, standardized containers, each one capable of holding about 70 liters, sealed with pitch, stamped on the outside with the producer's name, the weight of the empty container, the weight of the oil, and the signature of the state inspector who had verified both. Every amphora was a record, a bill of lading, a quality guarantee, and a unit of currency all at once. The ships carrying these amphorae sailed from Iberian ports to Ostia, Rome's harbor at the mouth of the Tiber, where they were offloaded onto river barges and hauled upstream to the city. The barge haulers worked in teams, walking the towpaths along the Tiber's banks, pulling the loaded vessels against the current. At the city's warehouses the oil was decanted into storage tanks, and the amphori were broken, not recycled and not sent back, broken and discarded in a specific location in the testaccio district of Rome, where they had been discarding broken amphori since at least the first century BC. The result of that ongoing disposal, accumulated over three centuries, is a hill. It is called Monte Testaccio, Monte meaning hill, testachio meaning broken pottery. It is thirty five meters high and roughly a kilometer in circumference, and it is made entirely of the broken remains of approximately fifty three million olive oil amphorae. Every shard in that hill once held oil, every jar once crossed the Mediterranean, every stamp on every shard records a specific producer, a specific inspector, a specific moment in the food supply chain of the largest city in the pre industrial world. Monte Testaccio, it is still there. You can visit it. It is a quiet, grassy hill in a working class neighborhood of Rome, and on summer evenings the restaurants and bars that have been built into its base, cool because the pottery insulates, are full of people eating and drinking. They are eating and drinking, as it happens, in the shadow of the material evidence of what eating and drinking looked like when this was the center of everything. The grain ships were larger still. Egypt alone sent approximately one hundred thirty five thousand tons of wheat to Rome annually. The largest grain ships could carry over a thousand tons per voyage, a carrying capacity not matched again until the nineteenth century. Alexandria to Ostia took roughly two weeks under favorable winds. The sailing season ran from late spring to early autumn. Winter seas were treacherous, and a delayed grain fleet could starve the city within weeks. The prefect of the grain supply, the Prefectus Anonae, was one of the most important officials in the empire, responsible for monitoring harvests in the provinces, coordinating the shipping schedule, managing the storage in Rome's two hundred and ninety warehouses, and ensuring that the distribution points had what they needed when they needed it. Without North Africa and Egypt, Rome could not feed itself. This was not a vulnerability that anyone in power failed to understand. When the Vandals seized Rome's North African provinces in four hundred thirty nine AD, the grain supply that had sustained the city for five centuries was cut off. Within a generation, the Western Roman Empire had ceased to exist. The hill of broken amphori, the warehouses, the bakeries, all of it had been predicated on a supply chain that ran from the fields of Egypt and Spain to the streets of a city that contained a million mouths. When the chain broke, the city emptied. By 500 AD, the population of Rome had fallen to perhaps a hundred thousand. By the early medieval period, it may have been as low as thirty thousand. The aqueducts still stood, the Colosseum still stood, but the thing that had actually kept the city alive, the grain, the oil, the logistics, the supplies, was gone. Now for the condiment. In the year one hundred AD, on any street in any city in the Roman Empire, you were never more than a short walk from a jar of fermented fish guts. This is garum and it is the most important single ingredient in Roman food history. Its factories were located outside city centers not for any obscure reason, but because the smell during production was powerful enough to constitute a public nuisance in the same category as a tannery or a slaughterhouse. What actually happened inside those factories was this. Small oily fish, anchovies, mackerel, sardines, sometimes tuna, were packed in large terracotta vats with substantial quantities of salt. The vats were left in the sun, outdoors for weeks to months. The natural enzymes in the fish guts began breaking down the proteins. The heat of the Mediterranean sun accelerated the process. The salt prevented dangerous bacteria from taking hold while allowing the beneficial fermentation to proceed. Over time, the solid material dissolved into a brown liquid. The liquid strained off the top of the vat was garum. The material that remained at the bottom, the solid residue of dissolved fish, called alloc, was sold separately as a cheap flavoring agent for the porridge and lentils of the poor. The liquid that came off the top was garum, and it ranged from grades barely better than alec to products so refined that Pliny the Elder, writing in the first century AD, compared the finest variety to expensive perfume. That finest variety, garum sociorum, made from mackerel at factories near what is now Cartagena in Spain, sold for roughly 4,000 sesterces per amphora. A Roman legionary soldier earned about 900 sesterces per year. The best garum cost, in other words, approximately four years of a soldier's pay for a single jar. It was purchased anyway by the people who could afford it, because there was nothing else that tasted like it. What did it taste like? This is the question that modern food scientists, archaeologists, and chefs have been attempting to answer since someone first thought to excavate a garum factory and analyze the residue. The answer is both simple and strange. It tasted like umami, not like fish, not like the sea, not like anything wet or oceanic or marine, like the fifth taste, that deep, complex, savory quality that makes Parmesan cheese satisfying and soy sauce. Indispensable, and a well-reduced beefstock worth the four hours it takes to make. Garam was a concentrated delivery mechanism for glutamic acid, the amino acid that the Japanese researcher, Kikune Ikeda, identified and named Umami in 1908. The Romans had been manufacturing it on an industrial scale for at least three centuries before Ikeda's grandfather was born. Seneca, writing in the first century AD, found it appalling. Do you not realize, he wrote, that garum, that expensive bloody mass of decayed fish, consumes the stomach with its salted putrefaction? He was describing the production process, which was indeed fairly alarming to observe. He was not describing the taste, which was something else entirely. The number that tells the story in the surviving Roman cookbook attributed to Apicius, the De Re Coconaria, the oldest cookbook in the world compiled over several centuries, and preserved in monastery copies that somehow survived the fall of Rome in the Dark Ages. Garum appears as an ingredient in 347 of the four hundred and fifty-nine recipes. Salt, the baseline seasoning of virtually every food tradition that has existed before or since, appears in three. The Romans did not salt their food the way every civilization before, and since has salted its food. They seasoned it with rotten fish. The man who made Pompeii's garum was named Aulus Umbritius Scorus. He was a freed slave who built a business, distributing garum from factories outside the city walls, and became wealthy enough to construct a house in Pompeii that archaeologists have identified as one of the finest in the city, with a private bath suite, spacious rooms, and a mosaic in the atrium, depicting four of his branded amphorae, each one labeled with a promotional description, finest fish sauce, finest mackerel sauce. He advertised his brand on his own floor. He is not known to history as a senator or a general or a philosopher. He made his fortune and his reputation on fermented fish, and he wanted anyone who entered his house to know it. Garam was, in a deep sense, the great social equalizer of the Roman food world. Everyone used it. The wealthy bought the premium grades from Cartagena. The middle classes bought the standard commercial grades that were available in every market in the empire. The poor used alec, but the fundamental flavor, the umami baseline, the savory depth that the Romans built their cuisine on, was the same from the emperor's triclinium to the poorest man's bowl of lentils. It was in the Thermopoleum's duck stew and in the senator's peacock, and in the soldier's ration kit, diluted with water to make hydrogarum, the army's standard drinking supplement. It traveled with the legions to Hadrian's Wall in Britain, where amphori of Garum had been found in the excavated remains of frontier forts two thousand miles from the factories that produced them. When the Roman Empire collapsed and the trade routes that moved Garum across the empire broke down, the condiment largely disappeared from European cooking. Medieval Europe reached for salt instead. The flavor world of Rome, the umami baseline, the sweet, sour, savory combinations, the fermented fish in everything, was lost so completely that it became essentially invisible to later history. It was always assumed that Roman food was a cruder, earlier version of what became Italian food. The assumption was wrong. Roman food was not Proto-Italian. It was something else entirely, and the thing that makes it most itself, the flavor, was one of the first casualties of the Empire's end. Speaking of flavor, the rest of it was also strange by modern standards. The Romans had no refined sugar that would not reach Europe from South Asia in meaningful quantities for several more centuries. Their primary sweetener was honey, which they used with the same liberal confidence that a modern cook uses sugar. They also used defrutum and sapa, reduced grape must, boiled down to a thick syrup, with a deep, sweet, smoky flavor that has no precise modern equivalent, though the Italian condiment saba comes close. No tomatoes. Those are new world crops, unknown to the Romans, no potatoes, no chili peppers, no chocolate. What they did have, an extraordinary range of vegetables, twenty types of legumes, dozens of apple and pear varieties, figs and dates, and pomegranates and quinces, oysters, which they farmed in dedicated aquaculture operations. Snails, which they fattened in specialized terracotta enclosures, called cochlearia, on a diet of milk and spelt until the snails were too fat to retreat into their shells. Dormice, which they fattened in clay jars called glieraria, small terracotta containers with ventilation holes and interior ledges, on a diet of walnuts and chestnuts, then roasted and served with honey. The dormice weighed in front of dinner guests on small scales as a demonstration of quality. A heavy dormouse was a status symbol. These are facts about a civilization that also produced the Pantheon, the Twelve Tables, Virgil, and the Aqueduct. And the flavor principle governing all of it was one that a modern Western palate simply does not encounter in its normal operation. Sweet and sour and savory simultaneously, all three present in most dishes at once. Honey and vinegar and garum together, reduced grape syrup and fermented fish over roasted meat, spiced wine with pepper and dates. The taste world of ancient Rome was, in its governing logic, much closer to high-end Vietnamese or Thai cooking, with its layered sweet, sour umami combinations, than to anything you would currently eat in Italy. A Roman transported to a modern Italian restaurant would find the food shockingly bland, under seasoned, and missing the entire depth register that Garam provided. A modern Italian chef transported to an Imperial Roman dinner party would find the food aggressively strange, and probably, once acclimated, extremely good. The people who could afford to find out how good it could get ate lying down. The triclinium was the formal dining room of an elite Roman household, and its defining feature was the arrangement of three large couches, clini, placed in a U shape around a central low table. The word triclinium comes from the Greek for three couches. Diners reclined on their left elbows, feet pointing outward, leaving their right hands free for eating. The posture was not an affectation. It was the bodily expression of a specific social ideology, that eating while seated was what poor people and children and servants did, and that reclining was what free men at leisure did. You reclined because you had the time and the space and the social standing to do so. The dinner party, the China, was the primary social institution of Roman elite life. Everything that mattered happened to dinner. Alliances were formed, debts were paid and hospitality, clients were entertained by patrons, patrons were reminded of obligations by clients. The ideal number of guests was nine, three to a couch, arranged in strict hierarchy, with the host and most honored guests on the couch furthest from the entrance. You knew exactly where you stood in the social order by looking at where you were placed. The food served at these dinners was designed as theater as much as sustenance. The wealthy imported their status ingredients from the furthest corners of the empire and beyond, pheasants from the Black Sea coast, flamingos from North Africa, oysters from the Lucrane Lake near Puteoli. The peacock was so prized that laws were passed at various points, attempting to restrict its consumption, and the laws were cheerfully ignored. At the most extravagant tables, flamingo tongue, which required killing a flamingo for a piece of meat the size of a thumb, sow's womb, which required slaughtering a pig at precisely the right moment of reproduction for an organ that most of the world would classify as awful. Dishes were designed not just to taste good, but to be surprising, to demonstrate wealth through apparent effortlessness, to show that the host could command impossible things. The most famous gourmet in Roman history, a man named Marcus Gavius Apicius, did things with food that were memorable enough to have been discussed for two thousand years. He invented a version of foie gras using pork livers, fattening the pigs on dried figs, and then killing them with an overdose of honeyed wine, believing this produced a liver of exceptional quality. He established cooking schools. He hosted banquets that defined excess, even by the generous standards of the imperial period. When he eventually calculated his remaining wealth, approximately 10 million sesterces, equivalent to perhaps 10 million dollars in purchasing power, and determined that this was insufficient to maintain the standard of dining to which he had become accustomed, he resolved the problem by taking poison. He killed himself rather than eat badly. The cookbook that bears his name, compiled over several centuries by various hands, is the oldest cookbook in the world that survives in a form we can actually read. The oldest recipe collection in Western history was left by a man who died of a food budget crisis. His cookbook, The De Re Cocinaria, contains no measurements and almost no instructions. It was written for trained professional cooks who already knew what they were doing, and reading it now is like reading sheet music with no time signatures or key signatures. The notes present, but the performance implied rather than specified. What it tells us in the aggregate of its nearly 500 recipes is that Roman elite cooking was a cuisine of extraordinary sophistication and completely alien flavor logic. Every recipe has garum. Most recipes have honey, most have vinegar. The sweet sarum principle runs through all of it like a structural beam, holding the whole edifice upright. And at the end of the day, the city that produced all of this, the Thermopolia and the Grain Dole, and the Hill of Amphori, and the Garum factories, and the men on their dinner couches, and the woman in the apartment above with no kitchen, went to sleep knowing something about food that the modern world spent fifteen hundred years forgetting. The food supply of Rome was not just an economic system, it was a statement about what it meant to belong to something. The grain that arrived from Egypt was conquest made edible. The oil that came from Spain was empire expressed as flavor. The garum that went into everything from the soldier's water ration to the senator's sauce was the taste of a civilization that had decided the depth of flavor mattered enough to build factories for it up and down the Mediterranean coast, that had decided the fermented guts of fish were worth shipping from Spain to Britain, that had decided the man who made the sauce worthy of a private bath suite and a branded mosaic in his atrium. What they ate was strange. What it meant was enormous. In the Testachio district of Rome today, the hill of fifty three million broken amphori sits under grass and soil, its surface marked by the occasional shard of terracotta visible after rain. The restaurants and bars built into its base are cool in summer, because the pottery insulates. On a warm evening, people sit outside those restaurants and eat and drink without thinking about what is underneath them. What is underneath them is the accumulated material evidence of lunch in the largest city in the world for 300 years. What is underneath them is the Roman food supply, broken and discarded and preserved, waiting in the dark.